Skip to content
Free NREMT practice questionsFree EMT practice questions · Patient Treatment and Transport

6 free EMT practice questions: Shock (All Types) & Hemorrhage Control

These are real questions from the same bank the app draws from. Each one is written to the NREMT EMT content specifications and kept inside the EMT scope of practice. Pick an answer and you get the full rationale, including why the other three options are wrong.

Work through all 6, then move on to the next topic. When you want the full picture, the free EMT diagnostic covers every topic in one sitting. No account needed for any of it.

Question 1 of 6

The EMT is transporting a 56-year-old patient who initially showed signs of compensated shock: pale, clammy skin, tachycardia, and normal blood pressure. Ten minutes into transport, the EMT performs reassessment and finds the patient's blood pressure has dropped to 88/50 mmHg, mental status has deteriorated to confusion, and the patient is more diaphoretic. What does this clinical change indicate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The patient is progressing from compensated to decompensated shock

This patient has gone from compensated shock to decompensated shock. The blood pressure has dropped to 88/50. A systolic pressure below 90 is the line between compensated and decompensated shock. The patient is also newly confused and sweating more. In compensated shock, the body releases catecholamines, which speed up the heart and tighten the blood vessels. The fast heart rate and tight vessels hold the blood pressure normal while perfusion is already falling. Once the catecholamines can no longer hold the pressure up, the systolic pressure drops. Less blood reaches the brain. That's why the patient is now confused. This patient is crashing. Keep the patient supine, keep high-flow oxygen on, and speed up transport.

Why the others are wrong

The patient is recovering; the drop in systolic pressure means the heart rate is normalizing: The heart rate does slow down as a patient truly recovers from shock. Nothing in this question shows the heart rate slowing. The lower blood pressure and the new confusion mean perfusion is getting worse, not better.

The patient is developing hypertension and will improve shortly: Hypertension means a high blood pressure. This patient's blood pressure is 88/50, which is low.

The patient's condition is stable and no change in care is needed: A stable patient has the same vital signs and mental status on each check. This patient's systolic pressure fell from normal to 88, and the patient became confused. Both changes call for more care right away, not routine transport.

Question 2 of 6

The EMT is transporting a 52-year-old patient with chest pain suspected to be cardiac in origin. Initial assessment shows the patient alert and oriented, with BP 134/82 mmHg, pulse 98/min, respirations 16/min, and skin warm and dry. On reassessment at 5 minutes, the patient is still alert but appears pale. The patient's skin is now cool and clammy to the touch. The patient's pulse has increased to 118/min. The patient's blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg. What is the most appropriate interpretation of these findings?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · The patient is progressing toward decompensated shock despite normal blood pressure; close monitoring is warranted

This patient is in compensated shock and is heading toward decompensated shock, even though the blood pressure is still normal. On the first check, the skin was warm and dry and the pulse was 98. Five minutes later, the patient is pale, the skin is cool and clammy, and the pulse is up to 118. The blood pressure is still normal at 128/80. The faster pulse and the tighter blood vessels in the skin are holding the blood pressure up for now. The skin and the pulse change before the blood pressure drops. Keep reassessing, give oxygen, position the patient, and be ready for the patient to get worse.

Why the others are wrong

The patient's condition is stable because the blood pressure has not significantly changed: A blood pressure that barely changed can look like stability. In shock, the skin goes pale, cool, and clammy before the blood pressure ever moves. This patient's new pallor, cool and clammy skin, and rising heart rate are the early warning signs.

The vital signs show only minor changes and do not warrant urgent intervention: Small changes in the vital signs can be minor when nothing else moves. The blood pressure only went from 134/82 to 128/80, and that change is small. The skin went from warm and dry to cool and clammy, and the heart rate climbed from 98 to 118. That trend is the pattern you see before a patient decompensates, and it needs action now.

The patient's heart rate increase is a normal response to chest pain anxiety and does not indicate shock: Anxiety from chest pain can raise the heart rate. Anxiety alone does not explain skin that turned pale, cool, and clammy over the same 5 minutes. The skin change and the rising heart rate together point to worsening perfusion.

Question 3 of 6

A 79-year-old patient from a long-term care facility has a fever and has been increasingly weak and confused for 2 days. The skin is warm and flushed. The vital signs are BP 86/56 mmHg, P 118/min, R 24/min, and T 102.8°F. Which of the following is most likely causing this presentation?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Septic shock

This patient is in septic shock. The temperature is 102.8°F, the skin is warm and flushed, the blood pressure is 86/56, and the pulse is 118. The patient is 79, lives in a long-term care facility, and has been getting more weak and confused for 2 days. Infection plus confusion in an older adult is sepsis until proven otherwise. The infection makes the blood vessels dilate and leak. The blood pressure drops, and the heart speeds up to make up for the drop. Give oxygen, and lay the patient supine for the low blood pressure. Keep the patient warm. Request ALS for IV fluids, because refilling the vessels is not an EMT skill. Transport promptly and say "possible sepsis" in your notification.

Why the others are wrong

Cardiogenic shock: gives a low pressure and a fast pulse from a failing pump after a heart attack or from heart failure. The skin turns cool, pale, and clammy. This patient has warm, flushed skin and a fever of 102.8°F. Warm skin with a fever points to dilated vessels from an infection, not a failing pump.

Neurogenic shock: follows a spinal cord injury. The nerves that hold vessel tone stop working below the injury. Neurogenic shock gives you a low pressure with warm, dry, pink skin and a normal or slow pulse. This patient's pulse is 118, and nothing points to a spinal cord injury.

Hypoglycemia: causes an altered mental status with pale, cool, sweaty skin. No blood sugar is given in this question. The fever of 102.8°F and the warm, flushed skin point to an infection, not low blood sugar.

Question 4 of 6

Which statement about anaphylactic shock is most accurate?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Each later exposure to the allergen can produce a stronger reaction

The first time a person meets an allergen, the body often mounts little or no response, but that exposure sensitizes the immune system, and each exposure after that can produce a reaction more severe than the one before it. That's why a history of a mild reaction to a substance never rules out a severe reaction on the next exposure.

Why the others are wrong

The reaction is strongest on the first exposure to the allergen: This has the pattern backward. A first exposure to an allergen typically produces little or no reaction; the severe reactions build with repeated exposure, not on exposure one.

The severity of the reaction depends only on the dose: Dose matters, but it doesn't explain why the same or a smaller dose can produce a mild reaction one time and a severe one the next; the difference is sensitization, not amount.

It is a failure of the immune system: Anaphylaxis happens because the immune system is overreacting to a substance it now treats as a threat, not because it has failed or shut down.

Question 5 of 6

A 59-year-old man has had severe vomiting and diarrhea for three days. He is confused and diaphoretic, with no palpable radial pulse and a blood pressure of 78/50. After administering high-flow oxygen, what should you do next?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Keep the patient warm, lay him supine, and transport rapidly

This patient is in decompensated non-hemorrhagic hypovolemic shock, which is shock from losing fluid instead of blood. He has had three days of vomiting and diarrhea. He is confused and diaphoretic, he has no radial pulse, and his blood pressure is 78/50. A pressure that low with no radial pulse tells you his body can no longer make up for the fluid he has lost. He needs his fluid replaced, and IV fluid is outside your scope as an EMT. With the oxygen running, cover him to keep him warm, lay him supine, and get him to the hospital fast.

Why the others are wrong

Withhold further treatment until the blood pressure improves: His absent radial pulse and pressure of 78/50 already tell you he is in decompensated shock. Withholding treatment until the pressure improves only lets a treatable emergency get worse.

Give the patient sips of water: Sips of water would replace fluid by mouth. This patient is confused, so he cannot reliably protect his own airway. Giving him water by mouth puts him at risk for aspiration. A patient in shock gets nothing by mouth.

Apply ice packs to the skin: Ice packs on the skin are for a patient who is overheated, like a patient in heat stroke. This patient's problem is lost fluid, not heat. Cooling the skin does nothing for the fluid he has lost. A patient in shock needs to stay at a normal body temperature, not get cooled.

Question 6 of 6

A 56-year-old man is found semiconscious by his wife. His breathing is rapid and shallow, his pulse is rapid and irregular, and his blood pressure is low. His wife says he complained of left arm pain and nausea yesterday but would not let her call 911. Which category of shock is he most likely in?

Show the answer and rationale

Correct answer · Cardiogenic shock

This patient is in cardiogenic shock. Yesterday he had left arm pain and nausea, and he would not let his wife call 911. Left arm pain and nausea are classic signs of a heart attack. A day later, the damaged heart muscle can no longer pump well enough to get blood to the rest of his body. His pulse is rapid and irregular, and his blood pressure is low. His breathing is rapid and shallow because fluid is backing up into his lungs. The pump is the problem here, not the blood volume or the blood vessels.

Why the others are wrong

Hypovolemic shock: comes from losing blood or fluid, and nothing in this call points to either one. His left arm pain and nausea yesterday point to his heart.

Septic shock: comes with a fever and a source of infection. His history has neither one.

Obstructive shock: comes from a tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, or a large clot in the lungs. He has no injury or history that points to any of those.

Find out which EMT topics are costing you points

Ten questions on one topic tell you about that topic. The free diagnostic covers every EMT topic and breaks your results down by topic, so you know what to drill next. No card, no signup to try it.

Take the free EMT diagnostic

More free EMT practice questions by topic